Kenyans In Usa Dating Sites

Kenyans In Usa Dating Sites Rating: 4,0/5 2744 votes
  • Mingle2 - The Best Place To Find Your Love in the USA. Love is a beautiful flower and Mingle2 wants to give it to you! All the single men, give us a shot and you'll know that we can help you write your love stories! Widely used: Thousands of attractive girls in the United States are waiting for you on this free dating site in the USA.
  • We had our first date on December 31st of 2004 and on June 28th, 2008 we got married!!! Customer from St Catharines, Ontario, CA. I met the love of my life on your site in July of 2006. We have been together every weekend since and were engaged this past Valentine’s Day. Customer from King of Prussia, PA, US.
  • Kenyan Diaspora Dating. Meet other Kenyan Singles wherever you live, with a mobile app. Download Date Kenyans app from App Store or Google Play. Use SpeedMatch feature and receive random photos of Singles near you, and if there is a connection, chat online with video chat or get a date in real life!
  • Well, right now, Hinge is the best dating site. It seems to fit my personality, or the personalities I find online. I like that the sign-up process takes 10 minutes, and that I can keep an eye on what the profiles of people are. If I was more like Digg, and wanted to check out all the profiles I could find, I wouldn’t be so overwhelmed.

Richard formed the Kenya Museum Associates (now Kenya Museum Society) with influential Kenyans in that year. They aimed to 'Kenyanise' and improve the National Museum. They offered the museum £5000, one-third of its yearly budget, if it would place Leakey in a responsible position, and he became an observer on the board of directors.


Born
Richard Erskine Frere Leakey

19 December 1944 (age 77)
NationalityKenyan
Spouse(s)
(m. 1965; div. 1969)​
(m. 1970)​
Children3, including Louise Leakey
AwardsHubbard Medal (1994)
Scientific career
FieldsPalaeoanthropology; Conservation
InstitutionsStony Brook University

Richard Erskine Frere LeakeyFRS (born 19 December 1944) is a Kenyanpalaeoanthropologist, conservationist and politician. Leakey has held a number of official positions in Kenya, mostly in institutions of archaeology and wildlife conservation. He has been Director of the National Museum of Kenya, founded the NGO WildlifeDirect and is the chairman of the Kenya Wildlife Service.[1]

Early life[edit]

Earliest years[edit]

As a small boy, Leakey lived in Nairobi with his parents, Louis Leakey, curator of the Coryndon Museum, and Mary Leakey, director of the Leakey excavations at Olduvai, and his two brothers, Jonathan and Philip.[2] The Leakey brothers had a very active childhood. All the boys had ponies and belonged to the Langata Pony Club. They participated in jumping and steeplechase competitions but often rode for fun across the plains to the Ngong Hills, chasing and playing games with the animals. Sometimes the whole club were guests at the Leakeys' for holidays and vacations. Leakey's parents founded the Dalmatian Club of East Africa and won a prize in 1957. Dogs and many other pets shared the Leakey home. The Leakey boys participated in games conducted by both adults and children, in which they tried to imitate early humans, catching springhare and small antelope by hand on the Serengeti. They drove lions and jackals from the kill to see if they could do it.[3]

Fractured skull[edit]

In 1956, at age 11, Leakey fell from his horse, fracturing his skull and lying near death. Incidentally, it was this incident that saved his parents' marriage. Louis was seriously considering leaving Mary for his secretary, Rosalie Osborn. As the battle with Mary raged in the household, Leakey begged his father from his sickbed not to leave. That was the deciding factor. Louis broke up with Rosalie and the family lived in happy harmony for a few years more.[4]

Teenage entrepreneur[edit]

Leakey chose to support himself, borrowed £500 from his parents for a Land Rover and went into the trapping and skeleton supply business with Kamoya Kimeu. Already a skilled horseman, outdoorsman, Land Rover mechanic, amateur archaeologist, and expedition leader, he learned to identify bones, skills which all pointed to a path he did not yet wish to take, simply because his father was on it.[5]

The bone business turned into a safari business in 1961. In 1962 he obtained a private aeroplane pilot license and took tours to Olduvai. It was from a casual aerial survey that he noted the potential of Lake Natron's shores for palaeontology. He went looking for fossils in a Land Rover, but could find none, until his parents assigned Glynn Isaac to go with him. Louis was so impressed with their finds that he gave them National Geographic money for a month's expedition.[6] They explored in the vicinity of Peninj near the lake, where Leakey was in charge of the administrative details. Bored, he returned to Nairobi temporarily, but at that moment, Kamoya Kimeu discovered a fossil of Australopithecus boisei. A second expedition left Leakey feeling that he was being excluded from the most significant part of the operation, the scientific analysis.

Marriage[edit]

In 1964 on his second Lake Natron expedition, Leakey met an archaeologist named Margaret Cropper. When Margaret returned to England, Leakey decided to follow suit to study for a degree and become better acquainted with her. He completed his high school requirements in six months; meanwhile Margaret obtained her degree at the University of Edinburgh. He passed the entrance exams for admission to college, but in 1965 he and Margaret decided to get married and return to Kenya. His father offered him a job at Centre for Prehistory and Palaeontology. He worked for it, excavating at Lake Baringo and continued his photographic safari business, making enough money to buy a house in Karen, a pleasant suburb of Nairobi. Their daughter Anna was born in 1969, the same year that Leakey and Margaret divorced. He married his colleague Meave Epps in 1970 and they had two daughters, Louise (born 1972) and Samira (1974).[7]

Palaeontology[edit]

Leakey's career as a palaeoanthropologist did not begin with a date-able event or a sudden decision, as did that of Louis; he was with his parents on every excavation, was taught every skill and was given responsible work even as a boy. It is not surprising that his independent decision-making led him into conflict with his father, who had always tried to instil in him that very trait. After he gave some fossils to Tanzania and set Margaret to inventory Louis' collections, Louis suggested in 1967 that Richard find work elsewhere.

Kenyans in america

Richard formed the Kenya Museum Associates (now Kenya Museum Society) with influential Kenyans in that year. They aimed to 'Kenyanise' and improve theNational Museum. They offered the museum £5000, one-third of its yearly budget, if it would place Leakey in a responsible position, and he became an observer on the board of directors. Joel Ojal, the government official in charge of the museum, and a member of the Associates, directed the chairman of the board to start placing Kenyans on it.

The Omo[edit]

Plans for the museum had not matured when Louis, intentionally or not, found a way to remove his confrontational son from the scene. Louis attended a lunch with EmperorHaile Selassie andPresidentJomo Kenyatta. The conversation turned to fossils, and the Emperor wanted to know why none had been found in Ethiopia. Louis developed this inquiry into permission to excavate on the Omo River.

The expedition consisted of three contingents: French, under Camille Arambourg, American, under Clark Howell, and Kenyan, led by Leakey. Louis could not go because of his arthritis. Crossing the Omo in 1967, Leakey's contingent was attacked by crocodiles, which destroyed their wooden boat. Expedition members barely escaped with their lives. Leakey radioed Louis for a new, aluminium boat, which the National Geographic Society was happy to supply.

On site, Kamoya Kimeu found a hominid fossil. Leakey took it to be Homo erectus, but Louis identified it as Homo sapiens. It was the oldest of the species found at that time, dating to 160,000 years, and was the first find contemporaneous with Homo neanderthalensis. During the identification process, Leakey came to feel that the college men were patronising him.[8]

Koobi Fora[edit]

During the Omo expedition of 1967, Leakey visited Nairobi and on the return flight the pilot flew over Lake Rudolph (renamed Lake Turkana from 1975) to avoid a thunderstorm. The map led Leakey to expect volcanic rock below him but he saw sediments. Visiting the region with Howell by helicopter, he saw tools and fossils everywhere. In his mind, he started formulating a new enterprise.

In 1968 Louis and Leakey attended a meeting of the Research and Exploration Committee of the National Geographic Society to ask for money for Omo. Catching Louis by surprise, Leakey asked the committee to divert the $25,000 intended for Omo to new excavations to be conducted under his leadership at Koobi Fora. Leakey won, but chairman Leonard Carmichael told him he'd better find something or never 'come begging at our door again'. Louis graciously congratulated Leakey.

By then the board of theNational Museum was packed with Kenyan supporters of Leakey. They appointed him administrative director. The curator, Robert Carcasson, resigned in protest, and Leakey was left with the museum at his command, which he, like Louis before him, used as a base of operations.[9] Although there was friendly rivalry and contention between Louis and Leakey, relations remained good. Each took over for the other when one was busy with something else or incapacitated, and Leakey continued to inform his father immediately of hominid finds.

In the first expedition to Allia Bay on Lake Turkana, where the Koobi Fora camp came to be located, Leakey hired only graduate students in anthropology, as he did not want any questioning of his leadership. The students were John Harris and Bernard Wood. Also present was a team of Africans under Kamoya: a geochemist, Paul Abel, and a photographer, Bob Campbell. Margaret was the archaeologist. Leakey took to smoking a pipe to enhance his status, as did Kamoya. There were no leadership problems. In contrast to his father, Leakey ran a disciplined and tidy camp, although, in order to find fossils, he did push the expedition harder than it wished.

In 1969 the discovery of a cranium of Paranthropus boisei caused great excitement. A Homo rudolfensis skull (KNM ER 1470) and a Homo erectus skull (KNM ER 3733), discovered in 1972 and 1975, respectively, were among the most significant finds of Leakey's earlier expeditions. In 1978 an intact cranium of Homo erectus (KNM ER 3883) was discovered.

Leakey was diagnosed with a terminal kidney disease in 1969. Ten years later he became seriously ill but received a kidney transplant from his brother, Philip, and recovered to full health.[7]

Leakey and Donald Johanson were at the time considered[by whom?] the most famous palaeoanthropologists, and scientifically their views on human evolution were differing - a scientific rivalry that gained public attention. This culminated at the Cronkite's Universe talk-show hosted by Walter Cronkite in New York in 1981, where Leakey and Johanson held a fierce debate on live TV-show.[10]

West Turkana[edit]

Turkana Boy – steps of forensic facial reconstruction/approximation

Turkana Boy, discovered by Kamoya Kimeu, a member of the Leakeys' team, in 1984, was the nearly complete skeleton of a Homo ergaster (though some, including Leakey, call it erectus) who died 1.6 million years ago at about age 9–12. Leakey and Roger Lewin describe the experience of this find and their interpretation of it, in their book Origins Reconsidered (1992). Shortly after the discovery of Turkana Boy, Leakey and his team made the discovery of a skull (KNM WT 17000, known as 'Black Skull') of a new species, Australopithecus aethiopicus (or Paranthropus aethiopicus).

Richard shifted away from palaeontology in 1989, but his wife Meave Leakey and daughter Louise Leakey continue to conduct palaeontological research in Northern Kenya.

Conservation[edit]

Richard Leakey in 1986

In 1989 Richard Leakey was appointed the head of the Wildlife Conservation and Management Department (WMCD) by President Daniel Arap Moi in response to the international outcry over the poaching of elephants and the impact it was having on the wildlife of Kenya.[11] The department was replaced by the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) in 1990, and Leakey became its first chairman. With characteristically bold steps Leakey created special, well-armed anti-poaching units that were authorised to shoot poachers on sight.[12] The poaching menace was dramatically reduced. Impressed by Leakey's transformation of the Kenya Wildlife Service, the World Bank approved grants worth $140 million. Richard Leakey, President Moi and the WMCD made the international news headlines when a stock pile of 12 tons of ivory was burned in 1989 in Nairobi National Park.

Richard Leakey's confrontational approach to the issue of human–wildlife conflict in national parks did not win him friends. His view was that parks were self-contained ecosystems that had to be fenced in and the humans kept out. Leakey's bold and incorruptible nature also offended many local politicians.[13]

In 2016 Richard Leakey achieved The Perfect World Foundation Award The Conservationist of the year 2016 & Prize 'The Fragile Rhino' at the Elephant Ball in Gothenburg, Sweden.

Plane crash[edit]

In 1993, a small propeller-driven plane piloted by Richard Leakey crashed, crushing his lower legs, both of which were later amputated. Sabotage was suspected but never proved.[14] While in the hospital, Leakey told President Moi, a religious man, not to pray for him, but act on matters pending for the Kenya Wildlife Service.[15] Since then, Richard Leakey has walked on artificial limbs.[16] Around this time the Kenyan government announced that a secret probe had found evidence of corruption and mismanagement in the Kenya Wildlife Service. An annoyed Leakey resigned publicly in a press conference in January 1994. He was replaced by David Western as the head of the Kenya Wildlife Service.

Richard Leakey wrote about his experiences at the Kenya Wildlife Service in his book Wildlife Wars: My Fight to Save Africa's Natural Treasures (2001).

Politics[edit]

In May 1995, Richard Leakey joined some Kenyan intellectuals in launching a new political party – the Safina Party, which in Swahili means 'Noah's Ark'. 'If KANU and Mr Moi will do something about the deterioration of public life, corruption and mismanagement, I'd be happy to fight alongside them. If they won't, I want somebody else to do it,' announced Richard Leakey. The Safina party was routinely harassed and even its application to become an official political party was not approved until 1997.

In 1997, international donor institutions froze their aid to Kenya because of widespread corruption. To placate the donors, Moi appointed Richard Leakey as Cabinet Secretary and head of the civil service in 1999. Leakey's second stint in the civil service lasted two years. He sacked 25,000 civil servants and obtained £250 million of funds from the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. However, Leakey found himself sidelined after the money arrived, and his reforms were blocked in the courts. He was sacked from his cabinet post in 2001.[16]

America[edit]

Leakey left Kenya for America in 2002, becoming a professor of anthropology at Stony Brook University, New York.[17] He was also Chair of the Turkana Basin Institute. In 2004, Leakey founded and chaired WildlifeDirect, a Kenya-based charitable organisation. The charity was established to provide support to conservationists in Africa directly on the ground via the use of blogs. This enables individuals anywhere to play a direct and interactive role in the survival of some of the world's most precious species. The organisation played a significant role in the saving of Congo's mountain gorillas in Virunga National Park in January 2007 after a rebel uprising threatened to eliminate the highly vulnerable population.

In April 2007, he was appointed interim chairman of Transparency International Kenya branch.[18] The same year, Leakey was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society[19] and received the Golden Plate Award of the American Academy of Achievement.[20] In June 2013, Leakey was awarded the Isaac Asimov Science Award from the American Humanist Association.[21]

Return to Kenya[edit]

In 2015, President Uhuru Kenyatta appointed Leakey chairman of the board of the Kenya Wildlife Service. Although he was chairman rather than director, Leakey played an active role in KWS policies.[16] He brokered a deal on the extension of the Mombasa–Nairobi Standard Gauge Railway, allowing the railway to pass over Nairobi National Park on an 18 m tall viaduct.[22] Leakey felt that the viaduct would set an example for the rest of Africa in balancing economic development with environmental protection. However, other Kenyan conservationists have opposed railway construction in the park.[23]

Angelina Jolie was to direct a biopic about Leakey's life, with Leakey in early 2016 expressing his confidence that the film would be shot in Kenya.[24]

Beliefs[edit]

Leakey stated that he is an atheist[25] and a humanist.[15]

Bibliography[edit]

Leakey's early published works include: Origins and The People of the Lake (both with Roger Lewin as co-author); The Illustrated Origin of Species; and The Making of Mankind (1981).

  • Origins (with Roger Lewin) (Dutton, 1977)
  • People of the Lake: Mankind and its Beginnings (with Roger Lewin) (Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1978)
  • Making of Mankind (Penguin USA, 1981)
  • One Life: An Autobiography (Salem House, 1983)
  • Origins Reconsidered (with Roger Lewin) (Doubleday, 1992)
  • The Origin of Humankind (Perseus Books Group, 1994)
  • The Sixth Extinction (with Roger Lewin) (Bantam Dell Pub Group, 1995)
  • Wildlife Wars: My Fight to Save Africa's Natural Treasures (with Virginia Morell) (St. Martin's Press, 2001)

See also[edit]

  • List of fossil sites(with link directory)
  • List of hominina (hominid) fossils(with images)

References[edit]

  1. ^People of the Lake. www.amazon.com. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  2. ^'Richard E. Leakey Biography and Interview'. www.achievement.org. American Academy of Achievement.
  3. ^Virginia Morell, Ancestral Passions, 1995, Chapter 18, 'Richard Makes his Move'.
  4. ^Morell, Virginia (1995). Chapter 17, 'Chimpanzees and Other Loves', in Ancestral Passions: The Leakey Family and the Quest for Humankind's Beginnings. ISBN978-0684824703.
  5. ^Richard E. Leakey in The Making of Mankind (1981), Chapter 1, p. 1, says he wished to be 'free' of his parents' world, a sentiment both Louis and Mary must have understood very well, even though they opposed his freedom.
  6. ^Morell, 1995, Chapter 18, 'Richard Makes his Move.' Besides Leakey and Glynn, the roster included Barbara Isaac, Philip Leakey, Hugo van Lawick and six of Mary's African assistants.
  7. ^ abTalk Origins – Richard Leakey
  8. ^This section is based on Morell, 1995, Chapter 20, 'To the Omo'.
  9. ^Morell, 1995, Chapter 21, 'Breaking Away.'
  10. ^Roger Lewin: Bones of Contention University of Chicago Press, 1997. ISBN0-226-47651-0
  11. ^''Kenya's wildlife – Predictions for the next decade' with Dr Richard Leakey'. Royal African Society. Retrieved 5 November 2016.
  12. ^Anthony Ham; Stuart Butler; Dean Starnes (2012). Lonely Planet Kenya. Lonely Planet. ISBN9781743213063.
  13. ^Bureau, Jane Perlez: Jane Perlez Is Chief of the Times'S Nairobi (7 January 1990). 'Can He Save the Elephants?'. The New York Times. ISSN0362-4331. Retrieved 25 May 2020.
  14. ^EDT, Graham Boynton On 08/28/14 at 6:33 AM (28 August 2014). 'Richard Leakey Tries to Save the Elephants—Again'. Newsweek. Retrieved 25 May 2020.
  15. ^ abRyan Shaffer, 'Evolution, Humanism, and Conservation: The Humanist Interview with Richard Leakey', The Humanist, 29 June 2012.
  16. ^ abcAstill, James (9 October 2001). 'African warrior'. The Guardian.
  17. ^Stony Brook University, Press release, 27 March 2007: 'World-Renowned Anthropologist Richard Leakey to be Honored at Stony Brook University's 50th Anniversary Gala April 11'.Archived 8 June 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  18. ^'Leakey takes over at TI'[permanent dead link], The Standard (Kenya), 4 April 2007.
  19. ^'Royal Society- Fellows 1660–2007'(PDF). Royal Society. Retrieved 8 March 2012.
  20. ^'Golden Plate Awardees of the American Academy of Achievement'. www.achievement.org. American Academy of Achievement.
  21. ^SmashPipe, 5 June 2013: Humanist Awards Banquet of the 2013 American Humanist Conference
  22. ^Njugunah, Margaret (14 September 2016). 'Kenya: SGR to Pass Over the Nairobi National Park'. Capital FM (Nairobi).
  23. ^Kahumbu, Paula (25 October 2016). 'Opposing camps to hold dialogue on railway through Nairobi National Park'. The Guardian.
  24. ^Boynton, Graham (23 September 2014). 'Richard Leakey: What does Angelina Jolie see in this man?'. The Telegraph.
  25. ^Leakey, Richard E. (1984). One Life: Richard E. Leakey: An Autobiography. Salem House Pub. p. 38. ISBN978-0881620559.

External links[edit]

Wikiquote has quotations related to: Richard Leakey
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Richard Leakey.
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Leakey&oldid=1036535251'

This page has been archived and is no longer updated

By: Briana Pobiner (Human Origins Program, Smithsonian Institution) © 2013 Nature Education
Citation: Pobiner, B. (2013) Evidence for Meat-Eating by Early Humans. Nature Education Knowledge4(6):1
The first major evolutionary change in the human diet was the incorporation of meat and marrow from large animals, which occurred by at least 2.6 million years ago.
The diet of the earliest hominins was probably somewhat similar to the diet of modern chimpanzees: omnivorous, including large quantities of fruit, leaves, flowers, bark, insects and meat (e.g., Andrews & Martin 1991; Milton 1999; Watts 2008). Tooth morphology and dental microwear studies suggest that the diet of some hominins may have included hard food items such as seeds and nuts, and underground storage organs (USOs) such as roots and tubers (Jolly 1970; Peters & O'Brien 1981; Teaford & Ungar 2000; Luca et al. 2010). By at least 2.6 million years ago, a remarkable expansion in this diet started to occur; some hominins began incorporating meat and marrow from small to very large animals into their diet. Let's explore the evidence for this dramatic shift using the 5 'W' questions: When, Where, Who, What, Why (and How).
Sites

When and where did hominin carnivory first occur?

The strongest evidence for meat and marrow eating are butchery marks found on bones. Slicing meat off a bone with a sharp-edged tool can leave cut marks (Figure 1). Pounding a bone with a large stone to break it open and extract the marrow inside can leave percussion marks. Cut and percussion marks, which together are called butchery marks, may be the result of skinning, disarticulation, and bone breakage for dietary and non-dietary reasons (Blumenschine & Pobiner 2006). Scientists began to recognize these butchery marks on Early Stone Age fossil assemblages in the 1980s (e.g., Bunn 1981; Potts & Shipman 1981; Blumenschine & Selvaggio 1988). Experimental and prehistoric evidence for human chewing on bones has only recently begun to be explored (e.g., Landt 2007; Delaney-Rivera et al. 2009; Fernandez-Jalvo and Andrews 2011; Pickering et al. 2013).


(a) 1.5 million-year-old fossil antelope lower leg bone (metapodial)
from Koobi Fora, Kenya, bearing cut marks; (b) close-up of these
cutmarks.
© 2013 Nature Education Courtesy of Briana Pobiner. All rights reserved.

Only those fossilized bones with butchery marks can confidently be tied to hominin diet (Blumenschine & Pobiner 2006). The earliest well-accepted evidence for this novel dietary behavior comes from about 2.6 Ma at the site of Gona, Ethiopia (Domínguez-Rodrigo et al. 2005). Probably not coincidentally, it's also around this time that we start to see the first evidence of archaeologically visible accumulations of stone tools (Semaw et al. 2003). There may be evidence of hominin-butchered bones at 3.4 Ma at Dikika, Ethiopia (McPherron et al. 2010), where Australopithecus afarensis remains have been found, but this evidence consists of only a few bone specimens and has been disputed (Domínguez-Rodrigo et al. 2010). The earliest well documented evidence of persistent hominin carnivory from in situ excavated fossil fauna occurring in association with large concentrations of stone tools is at about 2.0 Ma at Kanjera, Kenya (Ferraro et al. 2013). In addition to terrestrial animals, evidence from one site at Koobi Fora shows that hominins began to incorporate aquatic foods like turtles, crocodiles, and fish into their diets by about 1.95 Ma (Braun et al. 2010). Multiple localities at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania, dating to 1.8 Ma also show evidence of in situ butchered mammal remains, ranging in size from hedgehogs to elephants; these are also associated with large numbers of stone tools (Domínguez-Rodrigo et al. 2007; Blumenschine & Pobiner 2006 and references therein). Three sites at Koobi Fora, Kenya, preserve evidence of several butchered mammals from about 1.5 Ma but are not found in association with any stone tools (Pobiner et al. 2008). Perhaps this signals a shift toward intentional specialization of activities, such as animal butchery and stone tool making, in different areas across the landscape.

Currently, there is fossil evidence for at least three species of hominins occurring at around 2.6-2.5 Ma: Australopithecus africanus, Australopithecus garhi, and Paranthropus aethiopicus; H. habilis was established by around 2.4-2.3 Ma (Figure 2). There are no butchered bones (or stone tools) found at stratigraphic levels associated with A. africanus or P. aethiopicus, so those taxa are less likely to be our perpetrators. While butchered bones have been found near A. garhi fossils (de Heinzelin et al. 1999), it's only in the Homo lineage, especially in Homo erectus, that we see biological features often linked to meat-eating, such as a decrease in tooth and gut size and an increase in body and brain size (e.g., McHenry 1992; Aiello and Wheeler 1995; Antón 2003; Braun et al. 2010).
Homo habilis skull from Koobi Fora, Kenya.' />
Figure 2: Photograph of a cast of KNM-ER 1813, a 1.9 million-year-old Homo habilis skull from Koobi Fora, Kenya.
This is one of the most complete skulls of this species.
© 2013 Nature Education Courtesy of Chip Clark/Smithsonian Institution. All rights reserved.

The carnivory of hominins is unique among primates in three ways: (1) use of flaked stone tools to access animal resources; (2) acquisition of resources from animals much larger than the hominins themselves (Figure 3); and (3) procurement of animal resources by scavenging. Chimpanzees, our closest living relatives, routinely hunt, capture by hand, and eat meat from colobus or other smaller monkeys (e.g. Mitani and Watts 2001), but meat is a small proportion of their diet and they rarely scavenge (Watts 2008), most likely because they cannot efficiently digest carrion (Ragir et al. 2000). How this novel source of food was first recognized by hominins remains unknown. Hominins would likely not have been able to directly exploit grass as grassland expanded habitats across Africa - (though see Sponheimer et al. 2013) but an increase in large (grazing) animal resources would have been useful for any species that could procure and digest them (Plummer 2004). This shift marks an encroachment of a primate onto the larger carnivore guild, which would have challenged hominins with entirely new selective pressures (Brantingham 1999; Pobiner & Blumenschine 2003; Werdelin & Lewis 2005).
Homo erectus nearly 1 million years ago at Olorgesailie, Kenya.' />
A reconstruction of an elephant butchery by Homo erectus nearly 1 million years ago at Olorgesailie, Kenya.
© 2013 Nature Education Courtesy of Karen Carr/Smithsonian Institution. All rights reserved.

Why did hominins start eating more meat and marrow?

'Why' questions are notoriously difficult to answer about the past, but we can examine some of the benefits that meat and marrow provide. Meat and marrow are calorie-dense resources with essential amino acids and micronutrients (Milton 1999), and aquatic fauna offer resources rich in nutrients needed for brain growth (e.g., Broadhurst et al. 2002). Increasing the consumption of animal foods could have allowed hominins to increase their body size without losing mobility, agility, or sociality (Milton 1999). But what was the frequency and quantity of nutrients obtained by hominins from animal tissues versus other foods? Hominins at sites FLK 22 and FLKN 1-2, Olduvai Gorge, broke long bones of small to medium-large mammals in direct proportion to their estimated gross caloric yield from marrow fat (Blumenschine & Madrigal 1993 - but see Bunn et al. 2010 for a different interpretation of hominin behavior at FLKN 1-2). Long bone abundance of medium-large mammals at FLK 22 is also correlated significantly and positively to the net yield of marrow bones (Blumenschine & Madrigal 2000). Optimal foraging theory dictates that foods in the optimal diet set are expected to be consumed whenever encountered; the carcass encounter rate is dependent on a variety of ecological variables (Blumenschine & Pobiner 2006). This indicates that by at least 1.8 million years ago, carcass-processing decisions may have taken into account the energy yield of a variety of foods. Assuming opportunistic encounters with carcasses, these net yields are comparable to, or higher than, those for most, if not all, non-mammal food items harvested by tropical hunter gatherers (Blumenschine & Pobiner 2006 and references therein).

How did early humans obtain and utilize this meat and marrow?

The earliest evidence for hunting technology in the form ofhafted spear points, currently dates back to about 500,000 years ago (Wilkins

Kenyans In Usa Dating Sites

et al. 2012); complex projectile weapons only appear at 71,000 years ago (Brown et al 2012). Persistence hunting has been suggested as a mode of hunting that would have been possible without advanced technology, but it's not clear how we would recognize this behavior in the fossil or archaeological record. The earliest firm evidence for the controlled use of fire at hearths in the form of burned seeds, wood, and flint, likely related to cooking, dates back to about 790,000 years ago (Goren-Inbar et al. 2004). Evidence for earlier traces of fire in eastern and southern Africa associated with hominins at Koobi Fora, Chesowanja, and Swartkrans (e.g., Gowlett et al. 1981; Brain & Sillen 1988; Bellomo 1994) consists primarily of sediment discoloration and is not widely accepted (James 1989; Goren-Inbar et al. 2004). While modern human gut proportions and size are unique among great apes (Milton 1999), and studies have found signatures of selection in genes in modern humans that may have played a role in adaptations to dietary changes (Babbitt et al. 2011), it's unclear exactly when these anatomical and physiological changes that facilitated meat and marrow-eating took place.
Many zooarchaeologists who study Early Stone Age faunal assemblages think it's likely that at least some animal carcasses that were butchered by hominins, especially the larger ones, were obtained by scavenging. Soon after butchery marks were recognized on Early Stone Age fossils, articles on the ‘hunting or scavenging debate' in which hunting is implicitly viewed as behaviorally superior to and more ‘modern' than scavenging increasingly proliferated in the literature, especially centered around interpretations of the FLK 22 Zinjanthropus site at Olduvai Gorge (e.g. Binford 1981; Bunn 1981; Bunn 1986; Shipman 1986; Blumenschine 1988, 1995; Binford 1988; Bunn and Kroll 1986, 1988; Bunn and Ezzo 1993; Capaldo 1997; Domínguez-Rodrigo 1997; Dominguez-Rodrigo et al. 2007). Meanwhile, a series of actualistic studies of resource availability from scavenged carcasses was initiated (Blumenschine 1986, 1987; Cavallo and Blumenschine 1989; Selvaggio 1994; Capaldo 1995, Domínguez-Rodrigo 1999; Pobiner 2007), though some still viewed meat as a marginal food resource (e.g., Speth 1989). A history of this debate is beyond the scope of this paper (but see Bunn 1991; Domínguez-Rodrigo 2002; Domínguez-Rodrigo & Pickering 2003; and Plummer 2004 for reviews); it is not likely that these modes of carcass procurement - hunting and scavenging (whether passive scavengingoractive/confrontational scavenging) - were mutually exclusive behaviors, but were both employed depending on a variety of behavioral and ecological variables (e.g., available hominins in the group for carcass procurement, butchery, and transport; prey size, age, and species; habitat, other available food resources, and presence of other predators). Experimental models of the frequency and location of cut, percussion, and tooth marks (e.g., Blumenschine 1988) are most often used to inform us about the timing of access (early access vs. late access), and accumulator(s) that contributed to a zooarchaeological assemblage (e.g., Blumenschine 1995; Egeland et al. 2004).
Some unresolved questions in this area of research are:

1. How important were animal resources to hominins (versus plants and other non-animal resources), and how did this importance vary by hominin species, time period, habitat, or other variables?

Usa

2. How does the amount of meat and marrow available for scavenging in modern ecosystems vary with the size of prey (e.g., Blumenschine 1987; Pobiner 2007), the species of prey, predator species, predator group size, and ecological variables such as season and habitat? Would any of these variables affect frequency and location of butchery marks, and if so, how (e.g., Pobiner and Braun 2005)?

3. How can we evaluate whether confrontational scavenging or passive scavenging took place at any one site? What if more than one mode of carcass procurement took place? How did the acquisition of carcasses vary with different ecological affordances at different sites? How does the mode of carcass procurement relate to the timing of hominin access to animal resources (early access or late access)?

hominin: Refers to the human evolutionary group of species, including fossil and modern. This word comes from Hominini, a formal biological term in between the level of genus (e.g., Homo, Australopithecus) and the level of family (Hominidae)

carnivory: Obtaining foods from animals.

in situ: (Latin) meaning 'in the place.' In prehistoric studies, in situ refers to an artifact or fossil that occurs in the location where it was deposited. In situ materials are securely situated in a sediment layer, which allows archaeologists to date them and/or give them better context by studying other artifacts, fossils, or sediments that have been are found nearby in the same layer.

fauna: Animals, or pertaining to animals (such as faunal remains).

persistence hunting: A hunting technique in which the hunters use running, walking, and tracking to pursue their prey to the point of prey exhaustion.

Early Stone Age: A time period lasting from about 2.6 million to between 400,000 and 250,000 years ago that includes stone tools traditions called Oldowan and Acheulean. The Early Stone Age in Africa is roughly equivalent to what is called the Lower Paleolithic in Europe and Asia.

actualistic: A method of inferring the nature of past events by analogy with processes observable and in action in the present.

passive scavenging: Scavenging from an animal carcass that was killed by another predator, or that died of natural causes. Can yield a variety of amounts of different carcass resources (e.g. meat, marrow, brains) depending on whether another predator(s) had access to that carcass first and the sizes and species of the predator(s) and prey carcass.

Single kenyans in usa

active or confrontational scavenging: Scavenging from a carcass that involves confronting or chasing a predator in order to obtain resources from that carcass. Can yield a variety of amounts of different carcass resources (meat, marrow, brains) depending on whether another predator(s) had access to that carcass first and the sizes and species of other predator(s) and prey carcass. Often (incorrectly) assumed to yield more resources than passive scavenging.

early access: Obtaining resources from a carcass early in the carcass consumption sequence (usually first), whether by hunting or scavenging.

late access: Obtaining resources from a carcass later in the carcass consumption sequence (not first). Late access predators can obtain a variety of amounts of different carcass resources (meat, marrow, brains) depending on the size and species of other predator(s) had access to that carcass first and size of the prey carcass.

References and Recommended Reading

Aiello, L. C., & Wheeler, P. The expensive-tissue hypothe­sis:The brain and digestive system in human and primate evolu­tion. CurrentAnthropology 36, 199-221 (1995).

Andrews, P. & Martin, L. Hominoid dietaryevolution. Philosophical Transactions ofthe Royal Society of LondonB334, 199-209 (1991).

Antón, S.C. Natural history of Homo erectus.Yearbookof Physical Anthropology46, 126-170 (2003).

Babbitt,C. C. et al. Genomic signatures of diet-related shifts during human origins.Proceedings of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences278,961-969 (2011).

Bellomo, R. V. Methods of determining early hominid behavioral activities associated with the controlled use of fire atFxJj 20 Main, Koobi Fora. Journal of Human Evolution27, 173-195(1994).

Binford,L. R. Bones: Ancient Men and ModernMyths. Academic Press, New York(1981).

Binford,L. R. Fact and fiction about the Zinajnthropusfloor: data, arguments, and interpretations. Current Anthropology29,123-135 (1988).

Blumenschine,R. J. Carcass consumption sequences and thearchaeological distinction of hunting and scavenging. Journal of Human Evolution15,639-659 (1986).

Blumenschine, R. J. Characteristics of an early hominid scavengingniche. Current Anthropology28, 383-407(1987).

Blumenschine,R. J. An experimental model of the timing of hominid and carnivore influence onarchaeological bone assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science15, 483-502 (1988).

Blumenschine,R. J. Percussion marks, tooth marks, and experimental determinations of thetiming of hominid and carnivore access to long bones at FLK Zinjanthropus,Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Journal of HumanEvolution29, 21-51 (1995).

Blumenschine,R. J. & Madrigal, T .C. Variability in long-bone marrow yields of EastAfrican ungulates and its zooarchaeological implications. Journal of Archaeological Science20, 555-587 (1993).

Blumenschine,R. J. & Pobiner, B. L. Zooarchaeology and the ecology of Oldowan hominincarnivory. In Ungar, P. (Ed.), Early HomininDiets: The Known, the Unknown, and the Unknowable. OxfordUniversity Press, Oxford, pp. 167-190 (2006).

Blumenschine,R. J. & Selvaggio, M. M., Percussion marks on bone surfaces as a newdiagnostic of hominid behavior. Nature333, 763-765 (1988).

Blumenschine,R. J. et al. Vertebrate taphonomicperspectives on Oldowan hominin land-use in the Plio-Pleistocene Olduvai basin,Tanzania.In Breathing Life into Fossils:Taphonomic Studies in Honor of C. K. (Bob) Brain. eds. Pickering,T. R., Toth, N. & Schick, K. (Indiana:Stone Age Institute Press, 2007). 161-180.

Brain, C. K. & Sillen, A. Evidencefrom the Swartkrans cave for the earliest use of fire. Nature336, 464-466(1988).

Brantingham, P. J.Hominid-Carnivorecoevolution and invasion of the predatory guild. Journal ofAnthropological Archaeology17, 327-353 (1998).

Broadhurst, C. L. et al. Brain-specific lipids from marine, lacustrine,or terrestrial food resources: potential impact on early African Homo sapiens. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry andMolecular Biology131(4), 653-673.

Braun,D. R. et al. Early hominin dietincluded diverse terrestrial and aquatic animals 1.95 Ma in East Turkana, Kenya. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107, 10002-10007(2010).

Brown,K. S. et al. An early and enduring advanced technology originating 71,000 years ago inSouth Africa.Nature 491, 590-593.

Bunn, H.T. Archaeological evidence for meat-eating by Plio-Pleistocene hominids fromKoobi Fora and Olduvai Gorge. Nature291, 547-577 (1981).

Bunn, H. T. Patterns of skeletal representation and hominidsubsistence activities at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania and Koobi Fora, Kenya. Journalof Human Evolution15, 673-690(1986).

Bunn,H. T. A taphonomic perspective on the archaeology of human origins. Annual Review of Anthropology20, 433-467 (1991).

Bunn, H. T. & Ezzo, J. A. Hunting and scavenging byPlio-Pleistocene hominids: nutritional constraints, archaeological patterns andbehavioural implications. Journal of Archaeological Science20, 365-398 (1993).

Bunn,H. T. & Kroll, E. M. Fact and fiction about the Zinajnthropus floor: data, arguments, and interpretations. Current Anthropology29, 135-149 (1988).

Bunn,H T. et al. Was FLK North levels 1-2 a classic 'living floor' of Oldowan hominins ora taphonomically complex palimpsest dominated by large carnivore feedingbehavior? Quaternary Research 74(3),355-362.

Capaldo,S. D. Inferring hominid and carnivorebehavior from dual-patterned archaeofaunal assemblages. Ph.D. dissertation,Rutgers University (1995).

Capaldo,S. D. Experimental determinations of carcass processing by Plio-Pleistocenehominids and carnivores at FLK 22 (Zinjanthropus), Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania.Journal of Human Evolution33,555-597 (1997).

Cavallo, J. A. & Blumenschine R. J.Tree-stored leopard kills: expanding the hominid scavenging niche. Journal of Human Evolution18, 393-399 (1989).

Delaney-Rivera, C. et al. Pits and pitfalls: taxonomic variability and patterning in tooth mark dimensions. Journal of Archaeological Science36, 2597-2608 (2009).

de Heinzelin, J. et al. E. Environment and behavior of 2.5-million-year-old Bouri hominids. Science284, 625-629 (1999).

Domínguez-Rodrigo, M. Meat-eating by early hominids at the FLK 22 Zinjanthropus site, Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania): anexperimental approach using cut-mark data. Journal of Human Evolution33, 669-690 (1997).

Domínguez-Rodrigo,M. Flesh availability and bone modifications in carcasses consumed by lions:palaoecological relevance in hominid foraging patterns. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, and Palaeoecology149, 373-388 (1999).

Domínguez-Rodrigo, M. Hunting and scavenging by earlyhumans: the state of the debate. Journal of World Prehistory16, 1-54 (2002).

Domínguez-Rodrigo, M. &Pickering, T. R. Early hominid hunting and scavenging: a zooarchaeologicalreview. Evolutionary Anthropology12, 275-292 (2003).

Domínguez-Rodrigo, M. et al.Configurational approach toidentifying the earliest hominin butchers. Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences USA 107, 20929-20934 (2010).

Domínguez-Rodrigo, M. et al. Cutmarked bones from Pliocene archaeologicalsites at Gona, Afar, Ethiopia:Implications for the functions of the world's oldest stone tools. Journal of Human Evolution48, 109-121 (2005).

Domínguez-Rodrigo, M. et al. (Eds.) Deconstructing Olduvai: A Taphonomic Study of the Bed I Sites.Springer, Netherlands(2007).

Egeland,C. P. et al. Disentangling Early Stone Age palimpsests:determining the functional independence of hominid- and carnivore-derivedportions of archaeofaunas. Journal ofHuman Evolution47, 343-357(2004).

Fernández-Jalvo,Y. & Andrews, P. When humans chew bones. Journal of Human Evolution 60,117-123 (2011).

Ferraro et al. Earliest archaeological evidence of persistent hominin carnivory. PLoS ONE8, e62174 (2013).

Goren-Inbar,N. et al. Evidenceof hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Ya‘aqov, Israel. Science304, 725-727 (2004).

Gowlett,J. A. J. et al. Early archaeological sites, hominid remains andtraces of fire from Chesowanja, KenyaNature 294, 125-129(1981).

James,S. R. Hominid use of fire in the lower and middle Pleistocene: a review of theevidence. Current Anthropology30, 1-26 (1989).

Jolly,C. J. The seed-eaters: a new model of hominid differentiation based on a baboonanalogy. Man5, 1-26 (1970).

Landt,M. J. Tooth marks and human consumption: ethnoarchaeological masticationresearch among foragers of the Central African Republic. Journal of Archaeological Science34, 1629-1640 (2007).

Luca,F., Perry, G. H. & Di Rienzo, A. Evolutionary adaptations to dietarychanges. Annual Review ofNutrition30, 291-314 (2010).

McHenry,H. M. Body size and proportions in early hominids. American Journal of Physical Anthropoogy87, 407-431 (1992).

McPherron,S. P. et al. Evidence for stone-tool-assisted consumption of animal tissues before3.39 million years ago at Dikika, Ethiopia Nature 466, 857-860 (2010).

Milton, K. A hypothesis to explain the role of meat-eating inhuman evolution. EvolutionaryAnthropology8, 11-21 (1999).

Mitani,J. C. & Watts, D. P. Why do chimpanzeeshunt and share meat? Animal Behavior61, 915-924 (2001).

Peters,C. R. & O'Brian, E. M. The early hominid plant-food niche: insights from ananalysis of plant exploitation by Homo,Pan, and Papio in eastern and southern Africa.Current Anthropology22, 127-140 (1981).

Pickering, T. R. et al. Taphonomy of ungulate ribs and the consumption of meat and bone by 1.2-million-year-old hominins at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Journal of Archaeological Science40, 1295-1309 (2013).

Pobiner, B. Hominin-Carnivore Interactions: Evidence from Modern Carnivore BoneModification and Early Pleistocene Archaeofaunas (Koobi Fora, Kenya; Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania). Ph.D. Dissertation, Rutgers University (2007).

Pobiner, B. L. & Blumenschine, R. J. A taphonomicperspective on the Oldowan hominid encroachment on the carnivoran paleoguild. Journal of Taphonomy1, 115-141 (2003).

Pobiner,B. L. & Braun, D. R. Strengthening the inferential link between cutmarkfrequency data and Oldowan hominid behavior: Results from modern butcheryexperiments. Journal of Taphonomy3, 107-119 (2005).

Pobiner, B. L. etal.,New evidence for hominin carcass processing strategies at 1.5 Ma, KoobiFora, Kenya.Journal of Human Evolution55, 103-130. (2008).

Potts, R.& Shipman, P. Cutmarks made by stone tools on bones from Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania.Nature291, 577-580 (1981).

Ragir,S. et al. Gut morphology and theavoidance of carrion among chimpanzees, baboons, and early hominids. Journal of Anthropological Research 56, 477-512 (2000).

Selvaggio,M. M. Evidence from carnivore tooth marksand stone-tool-butchery marks for scavenging by hominids at FLK Zinjanthropus, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania.Ph.D. dissertation, Rutgers University (1994).

Semaw et al. 2.6-Million-year-old stone tools and associated bones from OGS-6 and OGS-7, Gona, Afar, Ethiopia. Journal of Human Evolution45, 169-177 (2003).

Shipman, P. Scavenging or hunting in early hominids: theoreticalframework and tests. AmericanAnthropologist88, 27-43 (1986).

Speth, J. D. Early hominid hunting andscavenging: the role of meat as an energy source. Journal of Human Evolution 18, 329-343 (1989).

Sponheimer et al. Isotopic evidence of early hominin diets. PNAS doi:10.1073/pnas.1222579110 (2013).

Teaford,M. F. & Ungar, P. S. Diet and the evolution of the earliest humanancestors. Proceedings of theNationalAcademy of Sciences USA97, 13506-13511 (2000).

Watts, D. P. Scavenging by chimpanzees atNgogo and the relevance of chimpanzee scavenging to early hominin behavioralecology. Journal of Human Evolution54, 125-133 (2008).

Werdelin,L. & Lewis, M. Plio-Pleistocene Carnivora of eastern Africa:species richness and turnover patterns. ZoologicalJournal of the Linnean Society144,121-144 (2005).

Wilkins etal. Evidence for early hafted hunting technology. Science 338, 942-946.

Kenyan Dating Sites For Mobile

Flag Inappropriate


Kenyans

Within this Subject (29)

Other Topic Rooms

Ecology Earth Systems Soil, Agriculture, and Agricultural Biotechnology Environmental Ethics Biological Anthropology

Kenyans In Usa Dating Sites For Pc


«Prev

Comments are closed.